Welcome To The World Of The UK Celt!
Nicola Sturgeon is the leader of Scotland, a (non) Celtic Nation. She believes that resources found off the shoreline of her part of the UK belong to HER country, and UK resources also belong to HER country, as part of the UK. She enjoys scoring points against the basically moribund English, and insists on 'Scots' not 'British' for her country's peoples - whether they like bagpipes or not. She thinks men are a 'problem', women are not, and is basically a Marxist Feminist and historical revisionist. She is the daughter of celebrated 1980s comedian Jimmy Krankie. Whoops, sorry, she LOOKS like the daughter of celebrated 1980s comedian Jimmy Krankie.
Hello, good morning/afternoon/evening/night to all who have come here eager to discover what it means to be a Celt in today's UK, and what it means NOT to be a Celt in today's UK.
Does being a Celt mean that you are English, 'Cornish' (I insert speech marks here because many 'Cornish' people consider themselves English), Scottish or Welsh with some historic lineage in the UK?
Bless your heart, no. It means that you call yourself a 'Celt' because of what Edward Lhuyd said in 1707 (a linguistic term - he didn't actually call your forebears or your nations Celtic) and you are a 'Cornish'/Scottish/Welsh/Irish person with a grievance, who wants to prove your moral superiority and the 'superior' length of tenure of your forebears in the British Isles.
It means you go on Wikipedia and rewrite the history of your 'Celtic nation', and basically play up to the notion that your ancestors were wonderful, mystical and basically a lovely white race. You brand their artefacts 'Celtic', whereas 'Iron Age' or similar would be a better description, and you create a complete work of fiction, designed to get you and your 'kind' better treatment than the 'rabble' in England - the most multi-ethnic UK nation, even proportionally.
You pursue this aim by claiming historical victimhood for your nations, and base it on the Marxist model of oppressed/oppressor. The English = Oppressors, The Cornish/Scots/Welsh/Irish = Oppressed.
Hello, good morning/afternoon/evening/night to all who have come here eager to discover what it means to be a Celt in today's UK, and what it means NOT to be a Celt in today's UK.
Does being a Celt mean that you are English, 'Cornish' (I insert speech marks here because many 'Cornish' people consider themselves English), Scottish or Welsh with some historic lineage in the UK?
Bless your heart, no. It means that you call yourself a 'Celt' because of what Edward Lhuyd said in 1707 (a linguistic term - he didn't actually call your forebears or your nations Celtic) and you are a 'Cornish'/Scottish/Welsh/Irish person with a grievance, who wants to prove your moral superiority and the 'superior' length of tenure of your forebears in the British Isles.
It means you go on Wikipedia and rewrite the history of your 'Celtic nation', and basically play up to the notion that your ancestors were wonderful, mystical and basically a lovely white race. You brand their artefacts 'Celtic', whereas 'Iron Age' or similar would be a better description, and you create a complete work of fiction, designed to get you and your 'kind' better treatment than the 'rabble' in England - the most multi-ethnic UK nation, even proportionally.
You pursue this aim by claiming historical victimhood for your nations, and base it on the Marxist model of oppressed/oppressor. The English = Oppressors, The Cornish/Scots/Welsh/Irish = Oppressed.
Braveheart? Total truth, of course - although it's absolutely not.
Being a UK Celt means that you are not actually a Celt. DNA evidence proves that amply. But historians are so cowed by your vehemence and victim culture they will say you have a 'Celtic' heritage instead, even though your genes are far more like the English (who, although largely of the same background, do not term themselves 'Celts') and the Celts didn't have male voice choirs, bake pasties or wear kilts.
Being a UK Celt means that you are not actually a Celt. DNA evidence proves that amply. But historians are so cowed by your vehemence and victim culture they will say you have a 'Celtic' heritage instead, even though your genes are far more like the English (who, although largely of the same background, do not term themselves 'Celts') and the Celts didn't have male voice choirs, bake pasties or wear kilts.
Of course, in reality, your countries are not perfect and 'victims' as you claim. Historically, you have clan warfare, the Darien disaster, the fact that the Poll Tax was the brainchild of Scot Douglas Mason, that it was implemented there a year earlier because the Scots Secretary of State wanted it, that your country was disproportionately active in the British Empire... and I could go on.
If, like Ireland, your country is partitioned by a Welsh Prime Minister, with the eager backing of Protestant Scots, the terrorist group formed years later will come over and bomb, kill and maim the English in protest because it will not harm its 'Celtic brothers'.
If, like Ireland, your country is partitioned by a Welsh Prime Minister, with the eager backing of Protestant Scots, the terrorist group formed years later will come over and bomb, kill and maim the English in protest because it will not harm its 'Celtic brothers'.
You always blame 'the English' - England - a country which was subsumed in the so-called 'union' hundreds of years ago as 'British'/'Britain', while you went on fiercely self-identifying.
There is a related movement to the white Celtic fiction endorsers and they are called 'nationalists'.
Nicola Sturgeon again. Go and change that suit, Nicola. It looks clarty.
Nationalists are very similar in their aims to secure their countries' elitist status - and sometimes believers in the 'Celtic' myth too. They also believe that the far larger and more ethnically diverse England is evil, and that they would fare better alone.
There is a related movement to the white Celtic fiction endorsers and they are called 'nationalists'.
Nicola Sturgeon again. Go and change that suit, Nicola. It looks clarty.
Nationalists are very similar in their aims to secure their countries' elitist status - and sometimes believers in the 'Celtic' myth too. They also believe that the far larger and more ethnically diverse England is evil, and that they would fare better alone.
Despite scooping more from the UK pot per capita than the people of England, sponsored largely by their largesse.
And so you have the Barnett Formula (and another formula before that), which means that your people get more per head for essential services than the people in England (it was called 'grossly unfair' to poor people in England by its creator, Lord Joel Barnett), and asymmetric national devolution, and all sorts of lovely and expensive things - like free prescriptions for millionaires - that the most ethnically diverse nation can't have.
Over the next few years we'll be diving down the rabbit hole of Celtic-ness in the UK, from dialects being redubbed languages, to the need of these people to belong to something white, mysterious, beautiful, ancient and fake, to more money and democratic representation for being of fake (and WHITE, of course) lineage, we'll have it all.
Welcome and please stay tuned.
And so you have the Barnett Formula (and another formula before that), which means that your people get more per head for essential services than the people in England (it was called 'grossly unfair' to poor people in England by its creator, Lord Joel Barnett), and asymmetric national devolution, and all sorts of lovely and expensive things - like free prescriptions for millionaires - that the most ethnically diverse nation can't have.
Over the next few years we'll be diving down the rabbit hole of Celtic-ness in the UK, from dialects being redubbed languages, to the need of these people to belong to something white, mysterious, beautiful, ancient and fake, to more money and democratic representation for being of fake (and WHITE, of course) lineage, we'll have it all.
Welcome and please stay tuned.


Comments
Post a Comment